HISTORY OF JOSEPH ZENTMAYER AND HIS AMERICAN HISTOLOGICAL
AND AMERICAN COLUMBIAN
STANDS
Joseph Zentmayer is one of the great names in microscopes not
only in America, but worldwide. His inventions included his improvement in the swinging
substage which has its axis of rotation centered at the stage, the gliding stage(found on his Grand
American Microscope, a
unique form of variable
diameter diaphragm, and a long lever type of fine adjustment. He was also the first to make a centerable substage that could be centered for high powered objectives. This is found on his 'Grand American' where the adjustments are made by slotted screws. Bulloch later changed the plan from screws to milled knobs. Zentmayer's swinging substage design was incorporated into the microscopes of many other makers of his day including Ross who termed them the Ross-Zentmayer Model.
The Zentmayer swinging substage became standard equipment on microscopes by
nearly all the major manufacturers of the day. It led to even more extreme concoctions to achieve even more oblique illumination. The unique form of the American Histological,
first patented in 1876, was very popular and later led to the (American Columbian) stand starting about 1893. This certainly correlates with the engraved 1897 date on the microscope featured at the top of this page.
Changes in the Columbian as compared to the American Histological, are relatively minor, at least externally. Shown below are engravings to compare, as well as examples of each. These changes are indicated by red arrows in the engravings as follows:
A- The nut under the fine focus on the earlier histological stand was cone-shaped. In the Columbian model, the nut was a capstan type that could be more easily adjusted using a
tommy bar
.
B- Most notable was the height of the support cone which was higher on the newer Columbian model, allowing the use of a longer tailpiece.
C- The longer tailpiece is pictured in the 1899 Catalog engraving, but interestingly, my example still had the older shorter tailpiece.


The purpose of the prize for B. Kohn remains a mystery, at least for the moment, as neither a reference to this prize or B. Kohn has yet been found. Of course I would welcome any additional information on B Kohn, and his or her prize.